3. ISCO 1995: Marburg, Germany

@proceedings{DBLP:conf/isco/1995,
  editor    = {Eckhard D. Falkenberg and
               Wolfgang Hesse},
  title     = {Information System Concepts: Towards a consolidation of views,
               Proceedings of the IFIP international working conference on information
               system concepts, Marburg, Germany, 28-30 March 1995},
  booktitle = {ISCO},
  publisher = {Chapman {\&} Hall},
  series    = {IFIP Conference Proceedings},
  volume    = {26},
  year      = {1995},
  isbn      = {0-412-63950-5},
  bibsource = {DBLP, http://dblp.uni-trier.de}
}

• David E. Avison, Joe Nandhakumar: The discipline of information systems: Let many flowers bloom! 1-17
• Klaus Voss: Comments on "The discipline of information systems: Let many flowers bloom!" by D. E. Avison and J. Nandhakumar. 18-19
• Peter Holm, Klas Karlgren: Theories of meaning and different perspectives on information systems. 20-32
• Ronald K. Stamper: Comments on "Theories of meaning and different perspectives on information systems" by P. Holm and K. Karlgren. 33-35
• Donal J. Flynn, David R. Knight, Alberto H. F. Laender: Multiple relationships: an analysis of their semantics and their modelling. 36-51
• Wolfgang Hesse: Comments on "Multiple relationships: an analysis of their semantics and their modelling" by D. J. Flynn, D. R. Knight and A. H. F. Laender. 52-53
• Matthias Rauterberg: About a framework for information and information processing of learning systems. 54-69
• Alex A. Verrijn-Stuart: Comments on "About a framework for information and information processing of learning systems" by M. Rauterberg. 70-71
• Michael Björn, Hyeon Kon Kim, Ryosuke Hotaka: A self-descriptive conceptual schema modelling facility, its implementation and extension. 72-87
• Bettina Schewe, Klaus-Dieter Schewe: A user-centered method for the development of data-intensive dialogue systems: an object-oriented approach. 88-103
• Rudi Studer: Comments on "A user-centered method for the development of data-intensive dialogue systems: an object-oriented approach" by B. Schewe and K.-D. Schewe. 104-105
• J. L. Han Oei: A meta model transformation approach towards harmonisation in information system modelling. 106-127
• Udo W. Lipeck: Comments on "A meta model transformation approach towards harmonisation in information system modelling" by J. L. H. Oei. 128-129
• Chrisanthi Avgerou, Tony Cornford: Limitations of information systems theory and practice: a case for pluralism. 130-143
• Steven Kelly: What's in a relationship? On distinguishing property holding and object binding. 144-159
• Heinrich C. Mayr: Comments on "What's in a relationship? On distinguishing property holding and object binding" by S. Kelly. 160
• James A. Sykes: English grammar as a sentence model for conceptual modelling using NIAM. 161-176
• Ryosuke Hotaka: Comments on "English grammar as a sentence model for conceptual modelling using NIAM" by J. A. Sykes. 177-178
• Gerd Wagner: From information systems to knowledge systems. 179-194
• Paul Lindgreen: Anything, everything and things playing roles: Three realizing principles as a contribution to a platform for understanding. 195-214
• James Odell: Comments on "Anything, everything and things playing roles: Three realizing principles as a contribution to a platform for understanding" by P. Lindgreen. 215
• John Krogstie, Odd Ivar Lindland, Guttorm Sindre: Defining quality aspects for conceptual models. 216-231
• Pentti Kerola: Comments on "Defining quality aspects for conceptual models" by J. Krogstie, O. I. Lindland and G. Sindre. 232-233
• Bruce A. Calway: Semiotic approach for object abstraction. 234-246
• Ronald K. Stamper: Comments on "Semiotic approach for object abstraction" by B. A. Calway. 247-249
• Jens Kaasbøll: Abstraction and concretizing in information systems and problem domains: implications for system descriptions. 250-265
• Alex A. Verrijn-Stuart: Business model representations. 266-281
• Roland Traunmüller: Comments on "Business model representations" by A. A. Verrijn-Stuart. 282-283
• Steven Alter: How should business professionals analyze information systems for themselves? 284-299
• Pentti Kerola: Comments on "How should business professionals analyze information systems for themselves?" by S. L. Alter. 300-301
• Eckhard D. Falkenberg: How far harmonisation? (Panel discussion set-up). 302
• Ryosuke Hotaka: Position paper on "How far harmonisation?". 303-304
• James Odell: Position paper on "How far harmonisation?". 305-308
• Arne Sølvberg: Position paper on "How far harmonisation?". 309-310
• Ronald K. Stamper: Position paper on "How far harmonisation?": Information system modelling myopia. 311-315