1. COMMA 2006: Liverpool, UK

Paul E. Dunne, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon (Eds.): Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006, September 11-12, 2006, Liverpool, UK. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 144 IOS Press 2006, ISBN 978-1-58603-652-2

Argument in Agent Systems

Iyad Rahwan, P. V. Sakeer:
Towards Representing and Querying Arguments on the Semantic Web. 3-14
Dionysis Kalofonos, Nishan C. Karunatillake, Nicholas R. Jennings, Timothy J. Norman, Chris Reed, Simon Wells:
Building Agents that Plan and Argue in a Social Context. 15-26
Daniel Bryant, Paul J. Krause, Gerard Vreeswijk:
Argue tuProlog: A Lightweight Argumentation Engine for Agent Applications. 27-32
Søren Holbech Nielsen, Simon Parsons:
An Application of Formal Argumentation: Fusing Bayes Nets in MAS. 33-44

Katie Atkinson:
Value-Based Argumentation for Democratic Decision Support. 47-58
Jure Zabkar, Martin Mozina, Jerneja Videcnik, Ivan Bratko:
Argument Based Machine Learning in a Medical Domain. 59-70
Pancho Tolchinsky, Sanjay Modgil, Ulises Cortés, Miquel Sànchez-Marrè:
CBR and Argument Schemes for Collaborative Decision Making. 71-82

Paul E. Dunne:
Complexity Properties of Restricted Abstract Argument Systems. 85-96
Søren Holbech Nielsen, Simon Parsons:
Computing Preferred Extensions for Argumentation Systems with Sets of Attacking Arguments. 97-108
Gerard Vreeswijk:
An algorithm to compute minimally grounded and admissible defence sets in argument systems. 109-120
Martin Caminada:
Semi-Stable Semantics. 121-130

Uwe Egly, Stefan Woltran:
Reasoning in Argumentation Frameworks Using Quantified Boolean Formulas. 133-144
Phan Minh Dung, Paolo Mancarella, Francesca Toni:
A dialectic procedure for sceptical, assumption-based argumentation. 145-156
Pietro Baroni, Massimiliano Giacomin:
Evaluation and comparison criteria for extension-based argumentation semantics. 157-168

Glenn Rowe, Chris Reed:
Translating Wigmore Diagrams. 171-182
Daan Verbree, Rutger Rienks, Dirk Heylen:
First Steps Towards the Automatic Construction of Argument-Diagrams from Real Discussions. 183-194
Thomas F. Gordon, Douglas Walton:
The Carneades Argumentation Framework - Using Presumptions and Exceptions to Model Critical Questions. 195-207
Thomas F. Gordon, Douglas Walton:
Pierson vs. Post Revisited - A Reconstruction using the Carneades Argumentation Framework. 208-219

Philippe Pasquier, Iyad Rahwan, Frank Dignum, Liz Sonenberg:
Argumentation and Persuasion in the Cognitive Coherence Theory. 223-234
Simon Wells, Chris Reed:
Knowing When To Bargain - The roles of negotiation and persuasion in dialogue. 235-246
Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Henry Prakken:
Justifying Actions by Accruing Arguments. 247-258

Claudette Cayrol, Caroline Devred, Marie-Christine Lagasquie-Schiex:
Handling controversial arguments in bipolar argumentation systems. 261-272
Diego C. Martínez, Alejandro Javier García, Guillermo Ricardo Simari:
On Acceptability in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with an Extended Defeat Relation. 273-278
Alison Chorley, Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon, Peter McBurney:
Automating Argumentation for Deliberation in Cases of Conflict of Interest. 279-290
Hajime Sawamura, Toshiko Wakaki, Katsumi Nitta:
The Logic of Multiple-Valued Argumentation and its Applications to Web Technology - Extended Abstract. 291-296
Sanjay Modgil:
Value Based Argumentation in Hierarchical Argumentation Frameworks. 297-308

Henry Prakken:
Combining sceptical epistemic reasoning with credulous practical reasoning. 311-322
Paolo Torroni:
Multi-agent agreements about actions through argumentation. 323-328
Paul E. Dunne:
Suspicion of Hidden Agenda in Persuasive Argument. 329-340